<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

   <channel>
       <title>Volume 6 - Water Alternatives</title>
       <description><![CDATA[<div id="nuan_ria_plugin"> Year 2013</div>]]></description>
       <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6?format=html</link>
              <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
       <atom:link href="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6?format=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
       <language>en-GB</language>
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>

              <item>
           <title>A6-3-09</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/229-a6-3-9?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/229-a6-3-9/file" length="433523" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/229-a6-3-9/file"
                fileSize="433523"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-09</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Perspectives of complexity in water governance: Local experiences of global trends </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20mlmoore@uvic.ca"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Michele-Lee Moore </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20mlmoore@uvic.ca">mlmoore@uvic.ca</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Those responsible for water governance face great complexity. However, the conceptualisations of what comprises that complexity have been broad and inconsistent. When efforts are made to address the complexity in water governance, it is unclear whether the problems and the related solutions will be understood across the actors and institutions involved. This paper provides a review of the literature focused on global water governance to discern core themes that commonly characterise discussions of complexity. It then considers how the consequences of these issues are manifested at the local scale through an examination of empirical research of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority and the Prachinburi River Basin Committee. The results demonstrate that a history of a technical, depoliticised discourse is often perceived to contribute to complexity. The consequence is that when a severe ecological disturbance occurs within a river basin with poorly understood causes, few tools are available to support river basin organisations to address the political nature of these challenges. Additionally, a lack of clear authority structures has been recognised globally, but locally this can contribute to conflict amongst the 'governors' of water. Finally, a range of contested definitions and governance frameworks exists that contributes to complexity, but confronting the diversity of perspectives can lead to ethical dilemmas given that the decisions will affect the health and livelihoods of basin communities.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Global, local, water governance, Murray-Darling, Prachinburi, complexity</span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/229-a6-3-9?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Perspectives of complexity in water governance: Local experiences of global trends </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20mlmoore@uvic.ca"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Michele-Lee Moore </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20mlmoore@uvic.ca">mlmoore@uvic.ca</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Those responsible for water governance face great complexity. However, the conceptualisations of what comprises that complexity have been broad and inconsistent. When efforts are made to address the complexity in water governance, it is unclear whether the problems and the related solutions will be understood across the actors and institutions involved. This paper provides a review of the literature focused on global water governance to discern core themes that commonly characterise discussions of complexity. It then considers how the consequences of these issues are manifested at the local scale through an examination of empirical research of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority and the Prachinburi River Basin Committee. The results demonstrate that a history of a technical, depoliticised discourse is often perceived to contribute to complexity. The consequence is that when a severe ecological disturbance occurs within a river basin with poorly understood causes, few tools are available to support river basin organisations to address the political nature of these challenges. Additionally, a lack of clear authority structures has been recognised globally, but locally this can contribute to conflict amongst the 'governors' of water. Finally, a range of contested definitions and governance frameworks exists that contributes to complexity, but confronting the diversity of perspectives can lead to ethical dilemmas given that the decisions will affect the health and livelihoods of basin communities.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Global, local, water governance, Murray-Darling, Prachinburi, complexity</span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-08</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/228-a6-3-8?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/228-a6-3-8/file" length="890745" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/228-a6-3-8/file"
                fileSize="890745"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-08</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Rethinking existing approaches to water security in remote communities: An analysis of two drinking water systems in Nunatsiavut, Labrador, Canada </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20christina_goldhar@nunatsiavut.com"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Christina Goldhar </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Nain Research Centre, Nunatsiavut Government, Nain, NL, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20christina_goldhar@nunatsiavut.com">christina_goldhar@nunatsiavut.com</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20tbell@mun.ca"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Trevor Bell </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20tbell@mun.ca">tbell@mun.ca</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20johanna.1wolf@royalroads.ca"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Johanna Wolf </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20johanna.1wolf@royalroads.ca">johanna.1wolf@royalroads.ca</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This paper introduces an approach to understanding water security in remote communities that emphasises drinking water access, availability, quality, and preference, presenting exploratory findings from Rigolet and Nain, located within the Inuit Settlement Region of Nunatsiavut, eastern Subarctic Canada. Individual and household interviews numbering 121 and 13 key informant interviews were conducted in 2009 and 2010. Interview findings were analysed with results from participant observation, a review of municipal water system records and secondary sources. Results reveal restricted access to a sufficient quantity of desirable, clean, drinking water for some residents, despite the existence of municipal water systems in both communities. Drinking water sources available to residents include tap water, store-bought water and water gathered from running streams, lakes and ice melt. Drinking water preferences and risk perceptions indicate these sources are regarded as distinct by study participants. 81% of respondents prefer water gathered from the land over other alternatives and 22% primarily consume this source while in the community. These findings must be understood within the context of drinking water system attributes and the geographies of people and place characterising the region.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Inuit, community drinking water system, perceptions of drinking water, drinking water preferences, water security, Arctic</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/228-a6-3-8?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Rethinking existing approaches to water security in remote communities: An analysis of two drinking water systems in Nunatsiavut, Labrador, Canada </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20christina_goldhar@nunatsiavut.com"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Christina Goldhar </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Nain Research Centre, Nunatsiavut Government, Nain, NL, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20christina_goldhar@nunatsiavut.com">christina_goldhar@nunatsiavut.com</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20tbell@mun.ca"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Trevor Bell </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20tbell@mun.ca">tbell@mun.ca</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20johanna.1wolf@royalroads.ca"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Johanna Wolf </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC, Canada; </span><a href="mailto:%20johanna.1wolf@royalroads.ca">johanna.1wolf@royalroads.ca</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This paper introduces an approach to understanding water security in remote communities that emphasises drinking water access, availability, quality, and preference, presenting exploratory findings from Rigolet and Nain, located within the Inuit Settlement Region of Nunatsiavut, eastern Subarctic Canada. Individual and household interviews numbering 121 and 13 key informant interviews were conducted in 2009 and 2010. Interview findings were analysed with results from participant observation, a review of municipal water system records and secondary sources. Results reveal restricted access to a sufficient quantity of desirable, clean, drinking water for some residents, despite the existence of municipal water systems in both communities. Drinking water sources available to residents include tap water, store-bought water and water gathered from running streams, lakes and ice melt. Drinking water preferences and risk perceptions indicate these sources are regarded as distinct by study participants. 81% of respondents prefer water gathered from the land over other alternatives and 22% primarily consume this source while in the community. These findings must be understood within the context of drinking water system attributes and the geographies of people and place characterising the region.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Inuit, community drinking water system, perceptions of drinking water, drinking water preferences, water security, Arctic</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-07</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/227-a6-3-7?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/227-a6-3-7/file" length="875663" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/227-a6-3-7/file"
                fileSize="875663"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-07</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>A qualitative analysis of rural water sector policy documents </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20annalegouais@gmail.com"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Anna Le Gouais </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Aguaconsult, Wivenhoe, Essex, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20annalegouais@gmail.com">annalegouais@gmail.com</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20e.wach@ids.ac.uk"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Elise Wach </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, Sussex, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20e.wach@ids.ac.uk">e.wach@ids.ac.uk</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This paper summarises the findings of a review of policy and strategy documents published circa 2008 by a diverse set of eleven development partners in the rural water sector. It was carried out as part of the Triple-S (Sustainable Services at Scale) Initiative using a Qualitative Document Analysis (QDA) approach to assess the extent to which the reviewed documents align with a set of ‘building blocks’ identified by Triple-S as integral to ensuring sustainable service delivery in the rural water sector. Based on the reviewed documents, the policies of the development partners included in this analysis demonstrate a clear commitment towards a number of important elements believed to be necessary for sustainable service delivery including learning and adaptive management, coordination and collaboration, capacity support for local government, and harmonisation and alignment. However, the analysis of the policy documents results in low scores for planning for asset management (i.e. renewals) and recognition and promotion of alternative service delivery options to community management (e.g. self- supply of, or delegated management to, the private sector). Thus, this study indicates that these areas, considered by Triple-S to be crucial for improving sustainability, are relatively neglected and merit more attention in the policies of organisations.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water, sustainability, policy, qualitative document analysis</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/227-a6-3-7?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>A qualitative analysis of rural water sector policy documents </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20annalegouais@gmail.com"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Anna Le Gouais </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Aguaconsult, Wivenhoe, Essex, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20annalegouais@gmail.com">annalegouais@gmail.com</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20e.wach@ids.ac.uk"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Elise Wach </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, Sussex, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20e.wach@ids.ac.uk">e.wach@ids.ac.uk</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This paper summarises the findings of a review of policy and strategy documents published circa 2008 by a diverse set of eleven development partners in the rural water sector. It was carried out as part of the Triple-S (Sustainable Services at Scale) Initiative using a Qualitative Document Analysis (QDA) approach to assess the extent to which the reviewed documents align with a set of ‘building blocks’ identified by Triple-S as integral to ensuring sustainable service delivery in the rural water sector. Based on the reviewed documents, the policies of the development partners included in this analysis demonstrate a clear commitment towards a number of important elements believed to be necessary for sustainable service delivery including learning and adaptive management, coordination and collaboration, capacity support for local government, and harmonisation and alignment. However, the analysis of the policy documents results in low scores for planning for asset management (i.e. renewals) and recognition and promotion of alternative service delivery options to community management (e.g. self- supply of, or delegated management to, the private sector). Thus, this study indicates that these areas, considered by Triple-S to be crucial for improving sustainability, are relatively neglected and merit more attention in the policies of organisations.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water, sustainability, policy, qualitative document analysis</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-06</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/226-a6-3-6?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/226-a6-3-6/file" length="613016" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/226-a6-3-6/file"
                fileSize="613016"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-06</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Unsubsidised self-supply in eastern Madagascar </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20mmaccarthy@mail.usf.edu"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Michael F. MacCarthy </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA; </span><a href="mailto:mmaccarthy@mail.usf.edu">mmaccarthy@mail.usf.edu</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20jonathanannis@care.org"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Jonathan E. Annis </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">WASHplus, CARE International, Washington, DC, USA; </span><a href="mailto:%20jonathanannis@care.org">jonathanannis@care.org</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20jm41@usf.edu"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">James R. Mihelcic </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA; </span><a href="mailto:%20jm41@usf.edu">jm41@usf.edu</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Self-supply is widely reported across various contexts, filling gaps left by other forms of water supply provision. This study assesses mature and unsubsidised Self-supply markets in an urban context in Madagascar. Locally manufactured drilling and pumping technologies are widely provided by the local private sector, enabling households to access shallow groundwater. The market for Pitcher Pump systems (suction pumps fitted onto hand-driven boreholes) has developed over several decades, reaching a level of maturity and scale. In the eastern port city of Tamatave, 9000 of these systems are estimated to be in use and Self-supply constitutes a primary domestic water source for the majority of the city’s 280,000 inhabitants. The market is supplied by more than 50 small businesses that manufacture and install the systems at lower cost (US$35-100) than a connection to the piped water supply system. Mixed methods are used to assess the performance of the Pitcher Pump system and the characteristics of the market. Discussion includes a description of the manufacturing process and sales network that supply Pitcher Pump systems, environmental health concerns related to water quality, pump performance, and system management. In a context where urban piped water supplies are unlikely to be accessible to all anytime soon, recommendations are made for further research and potential technology developments to improve the performance of Self-supply.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Low-cost technologies, sub-Saharan Africa, handpump, manual drilling, groundwater, lead (Pb), water supply, private sector</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/226-a6-3-6?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Unsubsidised self-supply in eastern Madagascar </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20mmaccarthy@mail.usf.edu"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Michael F. MacCarthy </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA; </span><a href="mailto:mmaccarthy@mail.usf.edu">mmaccarthy@mail.usf.edu</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20jonathanannis@care.org"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Jonathan E. Annis </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">WASHplus, CARE International, Washington, DC, USA; </span><a href="mailto:%20jonathanannis@care.org">jonathanannis@care.org</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20jm41@usf.edu"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">James R. Mihelcic </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA; </span><a href="mailto:%20jm41@usf.edu">jm41@usf.edu</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Self-supply is widely reported across various contexts, filling gaps left by other forms of water supply provision. This study assesses mature and unsubsidised Self-supply markets in an urban context in Madagascar. Locally manufactured drilling and pumping technologies are widely provided by the local private sector, enabling households to access shallow groundwater. The market for Pitcher Pump systems (suction pumps fitted onto hand-driven boreholes) has developed over several decades, reaching a level of maturity and scale. In the eastern port city of Tamatave, 9000 of these systems are estimated to be in use and Self-supply constitutes a primary domestic water source for the majority of the city’s 280,000 inhabitants. The market is supplied by more than 50 small businesses that manufacture and install the systems at lower cost (US$35-100) than a connection to the piped water supply system. Mixed methods are used to assess the performance of the Pitcher Pump system and the characteristics of the market. Discussion includes a description of the manufacturing process and sales network that supply Pitcher Pump systems, environmental health concerns related to water quality, pump performance, and system management. In a context where urban piped water supplies are unlikely to be accessible to all anytime soon, recommendations are made for further research and potential technology developments to improve the performance of Self-supply.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Low-cost technologies, sub-Saharan Africa, handpump, manual drilling, groundwater, lead (Pb), water supply, private sector</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-05</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/225-a6-3-5?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/225-a6-3-5/file" length="484551" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/225-a6-3-5/file"
                fileSize="484551"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-05</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Self-supply as a complementary water services delivery model in Ethiopia </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">John Butterworth </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl">butterworth@irc.nl</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20sally@ssutton.fsbusiness.co.uk"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Sally Sutton </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">SWL Consultants, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, United Kingdom; </span><a href="mailto:%20sally@ssutton.fsbusiness.co.uk">sally@ssutton.fsbusiness.co.uk</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20mekonta@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Lemessa Mekonta </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">SRS Consultants PLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; </span><a href="mailto:%20mekonta@irc.nl">mekonta@irc.nl</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Self-supply, where households invest to develop their own easily-accessible water supplies, is identified as an alternative service delivery model that is potentially complementary to more highly subsidised community-level provision. The approach is widespread in Ethiopia with family wells bringing additional benefits that are in line with wider government objectives, such as supporting small-scale irrigation. However, two recent studies show the current performance of traditional or family wells to be far below potential with most sources providing unsafe water in the absence of adequate protection. Wider formal recognition of Self-supply in policy and the development of the government-led Self-supply Acceleration Programme (SSAP) aim to extend access and improve aspects of performance including water quality. However, a key finding of the paper is that successful uptake of this programme requires a transformation in the attitudes of donor agencies and the roles of government regional- and woreda-level staff, amongst others. Necessary shifts in mindsets and revision of planning mechanisms, as well as the day-to-day operational support requirements, represent a challenge for an under-resourced sector. Other household-focused development interventions such as Community-led Total Sanitation (CLTS) and Household Water Treatment and Storage (HWTS) face some similar challenges, so the processes for the development of one approach could help in the scaling up of all.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Self-supply, groundwater, water supply, water quality, Ethiopia</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/225-a6-3-5?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>Self-supply as a complementary water services delivery model in Ethiopia </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">John Butterworth </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl">butterworth@irc.nl</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20sally@ssutton.fsbusiness.co.uk"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Sally Sutton </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">SWL Consultants, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, United Kingdom; </span><a href="mailto:%20sally@ssutton.fsbusiness.co.uk">sally@ssutton.fsbusiness.co.uk</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20mekonta@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Lemessa Mekonta </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">SRS Consultants PLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; </span><a href="mailto:%20mekonta@irc.nl">mekonta@irc.nl</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Self-supply, where households invest to develop their own easily-accessible water supplies, is identified as an alternative service delivery model that is potentially complementary to more highly subsidised community-level provision. The approach is widespread in Ethiopia with family wells bringing additional benefits that are in line with wider government objectives, such as supporting small-scale irrigation. However, two recent studies show the current performance of traditional or family wells to be far below potential with most sources providing unsafe water in the absence of adequate protection. Wider formal recognition of Self-supply in policy and the development of the government-led Self-supply Acceleration Programme (SSAP) aim to extend access and improve aspects of performance including water quality. However, a key finding of the paper is that successful uptake of this programme requires a transformation in the attitudes of donor agencies and the roles of government regional- and woreda-level staff, amongst others. Necessary shifts in mindsets and revision of planning mechanisms, as well as the day-to-day operational support requirements, represent a challenge for an under-resourced sector. Other household-focused development interventions such as Community-led Total Sanitation (CLTS) and Household Water Treatment and Storage (HWTS) face some similar challenges, so the processes for the development of one approach could help in the scaling up of all.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Self-supply, groundwater, water supply, water quality, Ethiopia</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-04</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/224-a6-3-4?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/224-a6-3-4/file" length="594120" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/224-a6-3-4/file"
                fileSize="594120"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-04</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>The impact of support to community-based rural water service providers: Evidence from Colombia </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Stef Smits </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl">smits@irc.nl</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20johnny.harold.rojas@correounivalle.edu.co"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Johnny Rojas </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Instituto Cinara, Universidad del Valle, Colombia; </span><a href="mailto:%20johnny.harold.rojas@correounivalle.edu.co">johnny.harold.rojas@correounivalle.edu.co</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20paola.tamayo@correounivalle.edu.co"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Paola Tamayo </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Instituto Cinara, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia; </span><a href="mailto:%20paola.tamayo@correounivalle.edu.co">paola.tamayo@correounivalle.edu.co</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: There is widespread recognition of the importance of support to community-based water service providers for sustainability of rural water supplies. However, there is little quantitative evidence to back this claim and a very limited understanding about the characteristics of support agents that are most significant in providing effective support.This paper presents the results of a study on support to service providers in Colombia, including a quantitative analysis of the impact of different support agents on service levels, performance of service providers and functionality of infrastructure assets. The methodology included: 1) characterisation of seven different support agents and their performance, 2) analysis of service levels, performance of service providers and functionality of infrastructure for 29 service providers that received structured support, and 3) analysis of the same factors for 11 service providers that did not receive structured support.Nearly all service providers in this study were found to receive some type of support, but sometimes this was unstructured and irregular. The providers receiving support in a structured and frequent manner performed better against a list of expected functions than the ones receiving ad hoc support. However, there was no clear effect found between support and the level of service that users received or the asset status. The paper also concludes that there is scope to improve the effectiveness of support agents, with key factors identified which explain that effectiveness; these key factors are the frequency of support, the institutional capacity of the support agent and the targeting of support to different types of communities.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water supply, recurrent support, community-based management, service providers, support agents</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/224-a6-3-4?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>The impact of support to community-based rural water service providers: Evidence from Colombia </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Stef Smits </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl">smits@irc.nl</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20johnny.harold.rojas@correounivalle.edu.co"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Johnny Rojas </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Instituto Cinara, Universidad del Valle, Colombia; </span><a href="mailto:%20johnny.harold.rojas@correounivalle.edu.co">johnny.harold.rojas@correounivalle.edu.co</a> <br /><a href="mailto:%20paola.tamayo@correounivalle.edu.co"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Paola Tamayo </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Instituto Cinara, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia; </span><a href="mailto:%20paola.tamayo@correounivalle.edu.co">paola.tamayo@correounivalle.edu.co</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: There is widespread recognition of the importance of support to community-based water service providers for sustainability of rural water supplies. However, there is little quantitative evidence to back this claim and a very limited understanding about the characteristics of support agents that are most significant in providing effective support.This paper presents the results of a study on support to service providers in Colombia, including a quantitative analysis of the impact of different support agents on service levels, performance of service providers and functionality of infrastructure assets. The methodology included: 1) characterisation of seven different support agents and their performance, 2) analysis of service levels, performance of service providers and functionality of infrastructure for 29 service providers that received structured support, and 3) analysis of the same factors for 11 service providers that did not receive structured support.Nearly all service providers in this study were found to receive some type of support, but sometimes this was unstructured and irregular. The providers receiving support in a structured and frequent manner performed better against a list of expected functions than the ones receiving ad hoc support. However, there was no clear effect found between support and the level of service that users received or the asset status. The paper also concludes that there is scope to improve the effectiveness of support agents, with key factors identified which explain that effectiveness; these key factors are the frequency of support, the institutional capacity of the support agent and the targeting of support to different types of communities.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water supply, recurrent support, community-based management, service providers, support agents</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-10</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/223-a6-3-10?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/223-a6-3-10/file" length="799781" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/223-a6-3-10/file"
                fileSize="799781"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-10</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><strong>The practices and politics of making policy: Irrigation management transfer in Mexico;</strong></span>
</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:%20e.rap@cgiar.org"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Edwin Rap</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">International Water Management Institute, Cairo, Egypt; </span><a href="mailto:%20e.rap@cgiar.org">e.rap@cgiar.org</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20flip.wester@wur.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Philippus Wester</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal; pwester@icimod.org, and Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20flip.wester@wur.nl">flip.wester@wur.nl</a></strong>
</p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This article argues that policy making is an interactive and ongoing process that transcends the spatio-temporal boundaries drawn by a linear, rational or instrumental model of policy. We construct this argument by analysing the making of the Irrigation Management Transfer (IMT) policy in Mexico in the early 1990s, focusing on different episodes of its re-emergence, standardisation, and acceleration. During this period a standardised policy package was developed, consisting of a set of specific policy technologies to effect the transfer to Water Users’ Associations (WUAs). These technologies were assembled in response to geographically dispersed trials of strength: experiments, consultations and clashes in the field, and negotiations at the national and international level. A newly installed public water authority increasingly succeeded in coordinating the convergence and accumulation of dispersed experiences and ideas on how to make the transfer work. Our analysis shows how this composite package of policy technologies worked to include a network of support and to exclude opposition at different levels, while at the same time stabilising an interpretation of policy-related events. In this way the policy gathered momentum and was 'made to succeed'.</span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Policy making, Irrigation Management Transfer, politics, bureaucracy, Water Users’ Associations, Mexico</span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"></span></span>
</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/223-a6-3-10?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><strong>The practices and politics of making policy: Irrigation management transfer in Mexico;</strong></span>
</p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:%20e.rap@cgiar.org"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Edwin Rap</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">International Water Management Institute, Cairo, Egypt; </span><a href="mailto:%20e.rap@cgiar.org">e.rap@cgiar.org</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20flip.wester@wur.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Philippus Wester</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal; pwester@icimod.org, and Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20flip.wester@wur.nl">flip.wester@wur.nl</a></strong>
</p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This article argues that policy making is an interactive and ongoing process that transcends the spatio-temporal boundaries drawn by a linear, rational or instrumental model of policy. We construct this argument by analysing the making of the Irrigation Management Transfer (IMT) policy in Mexico in the early 1990s, focusing on different episodes of its re-emergence, standardisation, and acceleration. During this period a standardised policy package was developed, consisting of a set of specific policy technologies to effect the transfer to Water Users’ Associations (WUAs). These technologies were assembled in response to geographically dispersed trials of strength: experiments, consultations and clashes in the field, and negotiations at the national and international level. A newly installed public water authority increasingly succeeded in coordinating the convergence and accumulation of dispersed experiences and ideas on how to make the transfer work. Our analysis shows how this composite package of policy technologies worked to include a network of support and to exclude opposition at different levels, while at the same time stabilising an interpretation of policy-related events. In this way the policy gathered momentum and was 'made to succeed'.</span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Policy making, Irrigation Management Transfer, politics, bureaucracy, Water Users’ Associations, Mexico</span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"></span></span>
</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-03</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/222-a6-3-3?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/222-a6-3-3/file" length="727734" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/222-a6-3-3/file"
                fileSize="727734"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-03</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>From adopt-a-project to permanent services: The evolution of Water For People’s approach to rural water supply in Bolivia </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20kfogelberg@waterforpeople.org"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Kate Fogelberg </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Water For People, Arequipa, Peru; </span><a href="mailto:kfogelberg@waterforpeople.org">kfogelberg@waterforpeople.org</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: The dominant paradigm in rural water provision in Bolivia has focused on the provision of infrastructure, whether by government agencies or international cooperation groups. However, the investment in infrastructure has led neither to universal access for all Bolivians nor to consistently high levels of services for those who do have access to a water system. This paper will describe the transition of one international non-profit organisation, Water For People, from supporting dispersed water projects throughout the country towards targeted support of water services at the municipal level, aiming to support permanent universal services. The institutional evolution – including changes in governance, implementation strategy, donor base, and indicators of success – that allowed field programmes to shift from projects to services provides the context for the change of approach in Bolivia. A discussion of the various aspects that have changed in the organisation’s operations in seven municipalities in Bolivia, from the scale of intervention, to municipal-wide planning information and tools, to support to service providers and service authorities, and an increased focus on post-construction monitoring, demonstrates how the Everyone, Forever approach is resulting in a more service- delivery-oriented approach in Bolivia.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water supply, non-governmental organisation, service delivery, sustainability, Bolivia</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/222-a6-3-3?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>From adopt-a-project to permanent services: The evolution of Water For People’s approach to rural water supply in Bolivia </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20kfogelberg@waterforpeople.org"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Kate Fogelberg </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Water For People, Arequipa, Peru; </span><a href="mailto:kfogelberg@waterforpeople.org">kfogelberg@waterforpeople.org</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: The dominant paradigm in rural water provision in Bolivia has focused on the provision of infrastructure, whether by government agencies or international cooperation groups. However, the investment in infrastructure has led neither to universal access for all Bolivians nor to consistently high levels of services for those who do have access to a water system. This paper will describe the transition of one international non-profit organisation, Water For People, from supporting dispersed water projects throughout the country towards targeted support of water services at the municipal level, aiming to support permanent universal services. The institutional evolution – including changes in governance, implementation strategy, donor base, and indicators of success – that allowed field programmes to shift from projects to services provides the context for the change of approach in Bolivia. A discussion of the various aspects that have changed in the organisation’s operations in seven municipalities in Bolivia, from the scale of intervention, to municipal-wide planning information and tools, to support to service providers and service authorities, and an increased focus on post-construction monitoring, demonstrates how the Everyone, Forever approach is resulting in a more service- delivery-oriented approach in Bolivia.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water supply, non-governmental organisation, service delivery, sustainability, Bolivia</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-02</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/221-a6-3-2?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/221-a6-3-2/file" length="566150" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/221-a6-3-2/file"
                fileSize="566150"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-02</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>How can INGOs help promote sustainable rural water services? An analysis of WaterAid’s approach to supporting local governments in Mali </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20stephenjones27@gmail.com"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Stephen Jones </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20stephenjones27@gmail.com">stephenjones27@gmail.com</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This paper examines how the international NGO WaterAid supports decentralised local governments in Mali to fulfil their role of service authorities within a service delivery approach for rural water services. WaterAid provides capacity support to local governments by creating and financing municipal WASH Technical Units that, in turn, provide direct support to community management of rural water supply. The paper compares this model to another approach for supporting rural water service providers in Mali in terms of the activities, scale and costs of direct support provided through each model.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">The paper finds that the model of WASH Technical Units promoted by WaterAid provides a more comprehensive set of support activities than the alternative approach suggested in national policy. The costs of the Technical Units are within international benchmarks for the expenditure on direct support suggested to be necessary for basic sustainable rural water services, but it is not yet clear how local governments in Mali can finance the costs of such an approach in the long term. Therefore, greater debate is needed in the national water sector about which aspects of support to rural water service providers are most important and what combination of actors can provide and finance this support.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water supply, service delivery, direct support, life-cycle costs approach, WaterAid , Mali</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/221-a6-3-2?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><b>How can INGOs help promote sustainable rural water services? An analysis of WaterAid’s approach to supporting local governments in Mali </b></span></p>
<p><b><a href="mailto:%20stephenjones27@gmail.com"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Stephen Jones </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20stephenjones27@gmail.com">stephenjones27@gmail.com</a></b></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: This paper examines how the international NGO WaterAid supports decentralised local governments in Mali to fulfil their role of service authorities within a service delivery approach for rural water services. WaterAid provides capacity support to local governments by creating and financing municipal WASH Technical Units that, in turn, provide direct support to community management of rural water supply. The paper compares this model to another approach for supporting rural water service providers in Mali in terms of the activities, scale and costs of direct support provided through each model.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">The paper finds that the model of WASH Technical Units promoted by WaterAid provides a more comprehensive set of support activities than the alternative approach suggested in national policy. The costs of the Technical Units are within international benchmarks for the expenditure on direct support suggested to be necessary for basic sustainable rural water services, but it is not yet clear how local governments in Mali can finance the costs of such an approach in the long term. Therefore, greater debate is needed in the national water sector about which aspects of support to rural water service providers are most important and what combination of actors can provide and finance this support.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Rural water supply, service delivery, direct support, life-cycle costs approach, WaterAid , Mali</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"> </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-3-01</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/220-a6-3-1?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/220-a6-3-1/file" length="556165" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/220-a6-3-1/file"
                fileSize="556165"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-3-01</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><strong>Trends in rural water supply: Towards a service delivery approach <br /></strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:%20moriarty@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Patrick Moriarty</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20moriarty@irc.nl">moriarty@irc.nl</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Stef Smits</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl">smits@irc.nl</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">John Butterworth </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl">butterworth@irc.nl</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20r.w.a.franceys@cranfield.ac.uk"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Richard Franceys </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20r.w.a.franceys@cranfield.ac.uk">r.w.a.franceys@cranfield.ac.uk</a></strong></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Behind headline successes in providing first-time access to water lie a number of pressing challenges to the dominant approach to rural water supply in developing countries, namely community management following a demand-responsive approach. These challenges manifest themselves in poor performance of service providers, high rates of hardware failure, and very low levels of service.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">The papers in this special issue argue that tackling these challenges requires a shift in emphasis in rural water supply in developing countries: away from a de-facto focus on the provision of hardware for first-time access towards the proper use of installed hardware as the basis for universal access to rural water services. The outline of the main actions required to achieve this shift are becoming clearer. Chief amongst these are the professionalisation of community management and/or provision of direct support to community service providers; adoption of a wider range of service delivery models than community management alone; and addressing the sustainable financing of all costs with a particular focus on financing capital maintenance (asset management) and direct support costs. This introductory paper provides an overview of these issues and a guide to the other articles, which demonstrate these points.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Water service delivery, life-cycle costing, asset management, community management</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"></span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/220-a6-3-1?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt; color: black;"><strong>Trends in rural water supply: Towards a service delivery approach <br /></strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:%20moriarty@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Patrick Moriarty</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20moriarty@irc.nl">moriarty@irc.nl</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Stef Smits</span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20smits@irc.nl">smits@irc.nl</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">John Butterworth </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; </span><a href="mailto:%20butterworth@irc.nl">butterworth@irc.nl</a><br /><a href="mailto:%20r.w.a.franceys@cranfield.ac.uk"><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: blue;">Richard Franceys </span></a><br /><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK; </span><a href="mailto:%20r.w.a.franceys@cranfield.ac.uk">r.w.a.franceys@cranfield.ac.uk</a></strong></p>
<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">ABSTRACT: Behind headline successes in providing first-time access to water lie a number of pressing challenges to the dominant approach to rural water supply in developing countries, namely community management following a demand-responsive approach. These challenges manifest themselves in poor performance of service providers, high rates of hardware failure, and very low levels of service.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">The papers in this special issue argue that tackling these challenges requires a shift in emphasis in rural water supply in developing countries: away from a de-facto focus on the provision of hardware for first-time access towards the proper use of installed hardware as the basis for universal access to rural water services. The outline of the main actions required to achieve this shift are becoming clearer. Chief amongst these are the professionalisation of community management and/or provision of direct support to community service providers; adoption of a wider range of service delivery models than community management alone; and addressing the sustainable financing of all costs with a particular focus on financing capital maintenance (asset management) and direct support costs. This introductory paper provides an overview of these issues and a guide to the other articles, which demonstrate these points.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;">KEYWORDS: Water service delivery, life-cycle costing, asset management, community management</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; color: #000000;"></span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue3</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>B6-2-1</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/219-b6-2-1?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/219-b6-2-1/file" length="236864" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/219-b6-2-1/file"
                fileSize="236864"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">B6-2-1</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p /><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><em>Shared borders, shared waters: Israeli-Palestinian and Colorado River Basin water challenges (Megdal, S.B., Varady, R.G. and Eden, S. (Eds). 2013). </em></span><br />
<span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">David B. Brooks </span><br />
]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/219-b6-2-1?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p /><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><em>Shared borders, shared waters: Israeli-Palestinian and Colorado River Basin water challenges (Megdal, S.B., Varady, R.G. and Eden, S. (Eds). 2013). </em></span><br />
<span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">David B. Brooks </span><br />
]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-15</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/218-a6-2-15?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/218-a6-2-15/file" length="633101" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/218-a6-2-15/file"
                fileSize="633101"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-15</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Decision making on Amazon dams: Politics trumps uncertainty in the Madeira river sediments controversy </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:pmfearn@inpa.gov.br" style="text-decoration: none;"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Philip M. Fearnside </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; </span><a href="mailto:pmfearn@inpa.gov.br" style="text-decoration: none;">pmfearn@inpa.gov.br</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: The Madeira River, an Amazon tributary draining parts of Bolivia, Peru and Brazil, has one of the highest sediment loads in the world. The questions of how these sediments would affect the Santo Antônio and Jirau hydroelectric dams, now under construction in Brazil, and how the dams would affect sediment flows, have been the subject of an extended controversy associated with the environmental licensing of the dams. Shortly before licensing the dams, the official scenario changed completely from one in which sediments would accumulate rapidly but could be contained without damage to dam operation, to one in which there would be no accumulation of sediments at all. The uncertainty of this scenario is very high. Under political pressure, the technical staff of the licensing department was overridden and the dams were licensed and built without resolving a variety of controversies, including the question of sediments. Valuable lessons from the Madeira River sediment controversy could contribute to improving decision making on dams and other major development projects in Brazil and in many other countries. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Hydropower, hydroelectric dams, environmental impact, Santo Antônio Dam, Jirau Dam, Brazil </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/218-a6-2-15?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Decision making on Amazon dams: Politics trumps uncertainty in the Madeira river sediments controversy </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:pmfearn@inpa.gov.br" style="text-decoration: none;"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Philip M. Fearnside </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; </span><a href="mailto:pmfearn@inpa.gov.br" style="text-decoration: none;">pmfearn@inpa.gov.br</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: The Madeira River, an Amazon tributary draining parts of Bolivia, Peru and Brazil, has one of the highest sediment loads in the world. The questions of how these sediments would affect the Santo Antônio and Jirau hydroelectric dams, now under construction in Brazil, and how the dams would affect sediment flows, have been the subject of an extended controversy associated with the environmental licensing of the dams. Shortly before licensing the dams, the official scenario changed completely from one in which sediments would accumulate rapidly but could be contained without damage to dam operation, to one in which there would be no accumulation of sediments at all. The uncertainty of this scenario is very high. Under political pressure, the technical staff of the licensing department was overridden and the dams were licensed and built without resolving a variety of controversies, including the question of sediments. Valuable lessons from the Madeira River sediment controversy could contribute to improving decision making on dams and other major development projects in Brazil and in many other countries. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Hydropower, hydroelectric dams, environmental impact, Santo Antônio Dam, Jirau Dam, Brazil </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-14</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/217-a6-2-14?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/217-a6-2-14/file" length="448402" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/217-a6-2-14/file"
                fileSize="448402"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-14</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong>Tapping fresh currents: Fostering early-career researchers in transdisciplinary water governance research </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:james.patterson@uq.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">James J. Patterson </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:james.patterson@uq.edu.au">james.patterson@uq.edu.au</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:alukasiewicz@csu.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Anna Lukasiewicz </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:alukasiewicz@csu.edu.au">alukasiewicz@csu.edu.au</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:phil.wallis@monash.edu"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Philip J. Wallis </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:phil.wallis@monash.edu">phil.wallis@monash.edu</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:naomi.rubenstein@monash.edu"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Naomi Rubenstein </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:naomi.rubenstein@monash.edu">naomi.rubenstein@monash.edu</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:brian.coffey@deakin.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Brian Coffey </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:brian.coffey@deakin.edu.au">brian.coffey@deakin.edu.au</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:e.gachenga@gmail.com"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Elizabeth Gachenga </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">University of Western Sydney, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:e.gachenga@gmail.com">e.gachenga@gmail.com</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jasmyn.lynch@canberra.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">A. Jasmyn J. Lynch </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jasmyn.lynch@canberra.edu.au">jasmyn.lynch@canberra.edu.au</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: Water governance is an important, yet complex and contested field. A central challenge for researchers is to engage with multiple understandings and perspectives that can shape water governance, and to move towards more transdisciplinary approaches. These challenges are magnified for early-career researchers (ECRs), and while the need for transdisciplinary approaches and better support for ECRs is increasingly recognised, there remains a lack of understanding of how to achieve this within the wider research community. Thus, this paper investigates through an auto-ethnographic inquiry the practical experiences and challenges faced by a diverse group of ECRs engaging in water governance research. Reflecting on our own endeavours and relevant literature, we identify a range of path-finding experiences and challenges, and explore strategies employed by ECRs to navigate the 'uncharted waters' of evolving career pathways in water governance research. 'Communities of Practice' are identified as a promising opportunity to support ECRs by enhancing opportunities for reflection and learning. Overall, we argue that there is significant merit in enhancing the way in which water governance research is understood, and improving the means by which ECRs are supported to build capability and contribute in this field. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Research practice, auto-ethnography, pathways, community of practice, interdisciplinary, water governance </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/217-a6-2-14?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong>Tapping fresh currents: Fostering early-career researchers in transdisciplinary water governance research </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:james.patterson@uq.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">James J. Patterson </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:james.patterson@uq.edu.au">james.patterson@uq.edu.au</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:alukasiewicz@csu.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Anna Lukasiewicz </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:alukasiewicz@csu.edu.au">alukasiewicz@csu.edu.au</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:phil.wallis@monash.edu"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Philip J. Wallis </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:phil.wallis@monash.edu">phil.wallis@monash.edu</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:naomi.rubenstein@monash.edu"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Naomi Rubenstein </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:naomi.rubenstein@monash.edu">naomi.rubenstein@monash.edu</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:brian.coffey@deakin.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Brian Coffey </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:brian.coffey@deakin.edu.au">brian.coffey@deakin.edu.au</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:e.gachenga@gmail.com"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Elizabeth Gachenga </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">University of Western Sydney, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:e.gachenga@gmail.com">e.gachenga@gmail.com</a> <br /> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jasmyn.lynch@canberra.edu.au"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">A. Jasmyn J. Lynch </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jasmyn.lynch@canberra.edu.au">jasmyn.lynch@canberra.edu.au</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: Water governance is an important, yet complex and contested field. A central challenge for researchers is to engage with multiple understandings and perspectives that can shape water governance, and to move towards more transdisciplinary approaches. These challenges are magnified for early-career researchers (ECRs), and while the need for transdisciplinary approaches and better support for ECRs is increasingly recognised, there remains a lack of understanding of how to achieve this within the wider research community. Thus, this paper investigates through an auto-ethnographic inquiry the practical experiences and challenges faced by a diverse group of ECRs engaging in water governance research. Reflecting on our own endeavours and relevant literature, we identify a range of path-finding experiences and challenges, and explore strategies employed by ECRs to navigate the 'uncharted waters' of evolving career pathways in water governance research. 'Communities of Practice' are identified as a promising opportunity to support ECRs by enhancing opportunities for reflection and learning. Overall, we argue that there is significant merit in enhancing the way in which water governance research is understood, and improving the means by which ECRs are supported to build capability and contribute in this field. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Research practice, auto-ethnography, pathways, community of practice, interdisciplinary, water governance </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-13</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/216-a6-2-13?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/216-a6-2-13/file" length="375589" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/216-a6-2-13/file"
                fileSize="375589"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-13</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt"><b><em>Viewpoint</em> - Development or disbursement - Vested interests and the gulf between theory and practice </b></span></p>
<p>
<b><a href="mailto:phil.riddell@ia2c.org" style="text-decoration: none"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt">Phil Riddell </span></a><br />
<span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt">International Agricultural Water Policy Adviser, Crozet, France; </span><a href="mailto:phil.riddell@ia2c.org" style="text-decoration: none">phil.riddell@ia2c.org</a></b> 
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">ABSTRACT: In almost 40 years of working in irrigation development and water resources management, I have noted a considerable inconsistency between development theory and the overwhelming need to disburse on the part of typical international financial institutions and development partners. In addition, the symptoms are apparent at every stage of a typical investment cycle. This essay cites first-hand examples to support my hypothesis. </span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">KEYWORDS: Planning, identification, feasibility, appraisal, evaluation, disbursement, development bank </span>
</p>
]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/216-a6-2-13?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt"><b><em>Viewpoint</em> - Development or disbursement - Vested interests and the gulf between theory and practice </b></span></p>
<p>
<b><a href="mailto:phil.riddell@ia2c.org" style="text-decoration: none"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt">Phil Riddell </span></a><br />
<span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt">International Agricultural Water Policy Adviser, Crozet, France; </span><a href="mailto:phil.riddell@ia2c.org" style="text-decoration: none">phil.riddell@ia2c.org</a></b> 
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">ABSTRACT: In almost 40 years of working in irrigation development and water resources management, I have noted a considerable inconsistency between development theory and the overwhelming need to disburse on the part of typical international financial institutions and development partners. In addition, the symptoms are apparent at every stage of a typical investment cycle. This essay cites first-hand examples to support my hypothesis. </span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">KEYWORDS: Planning, identification, feasibility, appraisal, evaluation, disbursement, development bank </span>
</p>
]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-12</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/215-a6-2-12?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/215-a6-2-12/file" length="402071" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/215-a6-2-12/file"
                fileSize="402071"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-12</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt"><b><em>Viewpoint</em> - Swimming against the current: Questioning development policy and practice </b></span></p>
<p>
<b><a href="mailto:kum@diis.dk" style="text-decoration: none"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt">Kurt Mørck Jensen </span></a><br />
<span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt">Senior Analyst, Danish Institute for International Studies and Senior Adviser, Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Danida), </span><a href="mailto:kum@diis.dk" style="text-decoration: none">kum@diis.dk</a> </b>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">ABSTRACT: The water world is dominated by normative policies prescribing what "good development" is all about. It is a universe of its own where policies live their own lives and feed in and out of each other. As new buzzwords continue to be invented or reinvented, policies continue to maintain their shiny images of how water resources or water supply should be managed. There are many water professionals acting as missionaries in the service of policies but probably less professionals acting up against blindfolded policy promotion. It is when water policies are being implemented in the real world that the trouble starts. In spite of their well-intended mission, water policies often suffer shipwreck on the socio-economic and political realities in developing countries. Through cases from India and the Mekong, the author demonstrates what happens when normative water polices are forced out of their comfort zone and into social and political realities. Although policies are made of stubborn material they need to be questioned through continuous analytical insight into developing country realities. But undertaking critical analysis and questioning the wisdom of water policies is easier said than done. It takes a lot of effort to swim against the policy current. </span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">KEYWORDS: Water policies, water resources, water supply, Integrated Water Resources Management, river basin management, India, the Mekong, politics </span>
</p>
]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/215-a6-2-12?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt"><b><em>Viewpoint</em> - Swimming against the current: Questioning development policy and practice </b></span></p>
<p>
<b><a href="mailto:kum@diis.dk" style="text-decoration: none"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt">Kurt Mørck Jensen </span></a><br />
<span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt">Senior Analyst, Danish Institute for International Studies and Senior Adviser, Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Danida), </span><a href="mailto:kum@diis.dk" style="text-decoration: none">kum@diis.dk</a> </b>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">ABSTRACT: The water world is dominated by normative policies prescribing what "good development" is all about. It is a universe of its own where policies live their own lives and feed in and out of each other. As new buzzwords continue to be invented or reinvented, policies continue to maintain their shiny images of how water resources or water supply should be managed. There are many water professionals acting as missionaries in the service of policies but probably less professionals acting up against blindfolded policy promotion. It is when water policies are being implemented in the real world that the trouble starts. In spite of their well-intended mission, water policies often suffer shipwreck on the socio-economic and political realities in developing countries. Through cases from India and the Mekong, the author demonstrates what happens when normative water polices are forced out of their comfort zone and into social and political realities. Although policies are made of stubborn material they need to be questioned through continuous analytical insight into developing country realities. But undertaking critical analysis and questioning the wisdom of water policies is easier said than done. It takes a lot of effort to swim against the policy current. </span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">KEYWORDS: Water policies, water resources, water supply, Integrated Water Resources Management, river basin management, India, the Mekong, politics </span>
</p>
]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-11</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/214-a6-2-11?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/214-a6-2-11/file" length="417338" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/214-a6-2-11/file"
                fileSize="417338"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-11</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Rent-seeking in agricultural water management: An intentionally neglected core dimension? </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:walter.huppert@freenet.de"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Walter Huppert </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Independent Consultant, Former Senior Technical Adviser, GIZ (former GTZ), Germany; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:walter.huppert@freenet.de">walter.huppert@freenet.de</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: In the early and mid-1980s, two seminal papers on agricultural water management came as a shock to the international professional community. They drew attention to the fact that public irrigation is particularly prone to rent-seeking and corruption. Both papers - one by Robert Wade in 1982 and the other by Robert Repetto in 1986 - described hidden interests of the involved stakeholders in irrigation development and management that open doors to opportunistic behaviour - thus perpetuating technical and economical inefficiencies.<br /> About twenty-five years later, Transparency International (TI) in its often cited Global Corruption Report 2008 - dedicated to the issue of corruption in the water sector - made the following statement: "corruption remains one of the least analysed and recognised problems in the water sector. This report provides a first step in filling this gap" (TI, 2008: 1069).<br /> The question arises as to why, through twenty-five years following the publications of Wade and Repetto, the topics of corruption and rent-seeking in agricultural water management seldom gained serious attention in international research and development. And why, strangely enough, the critical topic of rent-seeking is hardly dealt with in the above-mentioned report and even in recent publications of the Water Integrity Network (WIN).<br /> The author, drawing on thirty-five years of experience in the field of agricultural water management and on cases from research and from development cooperation, puts forward his personal viewpoint on this matter. He contends that local as well as international professionals on different levels in the water sector are caught in multifaceted conflicts between formal objectives and hidden interests - and often tend to resort to rent-seeking behaviour themselves. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: rent-seeking, corruption, water management, irrigation development, irrigation maintenance </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/214-a6-2-11?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Rent-seeking in agricultural water management: An intentionally neglected core dimension? </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:walter.huppert@freenet.de"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Walter Huppert </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Independent Consultant, Former Senior Technical Adviser, GIZ (former GTZ), Germany; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:walter.huppert@freenet.de">walter.huppert@freenet.de</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: In the early and mid-1980s, two seminal papers on agricultural water management came as a shock to the international professional community. They drew attention to the fact that public irrigation is particularly prone to rent-seeking and corruption. Both papers - one by Robert Wade in 1982 and the other by Robert Repetto in 1986 - described hidden interests of the involved stakeholders in irrigation development and management that open doors to opportunistic behaviour - thus perpetuating technical and economical inefficiencies.<br /> About twenty-five years later, Transparency International (TI) in its often cited Global Corruption Report 2008 - dedicated to the issue of corruption in the water sector - made the following statement: "corruption remains one of the least analysed and recognised problems in the water sector. This report provides a first step in filling this gap" (TI, 2008: 1069).<br /> The question arises as to why, through twenty-five years following the publications of Wade and Repetto, the topics of corruption and rent-seeking in agricultural water management seldom gained serious attention in international research and development. And why, strangely enough, the critical topic of rent-seeking is hardly dealt with in the above-mentioned report and even in recent publications of the Water Integrity Network (WIN).<br /> The author, drawing on thirty-five years of experience in the field of agricultural water management and on cases from research and from development cooperation, puts forward his personal viewpoint on this matter. He contends that local as well as international professionals on different levels in the water sector are caught in multifaceted conflicts between formal objectives and hidden interests - and often tend to resort to rent-seeking behaviour themselves. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: rent-seeking, corruption, water management, irrigation development, irrigation maintenance </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-10</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/213-a6-2-10?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/213-a6-2-10/file" length="420641" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/213-a6-2-10/file"
                fileSize="420641"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-10</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - The search for understanding irrigation - Fifty years of learning </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:gl14@cornell.edu"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Gilbert Levine </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Professor Emeritus, Biological and Environmental Engineering Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:gl14@cornell.edu">gl14@cornell.edu</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: For those involved in international irrigation development activities there often are feelings of frustration. This note is an effort to identify underlying sources of the frustrations that come from external limits that are placed on thinking, from fads that often dominate, and from the influence of power that can overwhelm one's best efforts. Problems of ignorance, wilful and otherwise, the existence of unspoken objectives, and the one-size-fits-all approach are addressed from the perspective of personal experience including research, consulting, and grant-making. Basic to many of the problems are the personal motivations of those with decision-making authority. Examples from the Philippines, India and Pakistan illustrate the problems. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Irrigation, development, constraints, misfeasance </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/213-a6-2-10?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - The search for understanding irrigation - Fifty years of learning </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:gl14@cornell.edu"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Gilbert Levine </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Professor Emeritus, Biological and Environmental Engineering Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:gl14@cornell.edu">gl14@cornell.edu</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: For those involved in international irrigation development activities there often are feelings of frustration. This note is an effort to identify underlying sources of the frustrations that come from external limits that are placed on thinking, from fads that often dominate, and from the influence of power that can overwhelm one's best efforts. Problems of ignorance, wilful and otherwise, the existence of unspoken objectives, and the one-size-fits-all approach are addressed from the perspective of personal experience including research, consulting, and grant-making. Basic to many of the problems are the personal motivations of those with decision-making authority. Examples from the Philippines, India and Pakistan illustrate the problems. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Irrigation, development, constraints, misfeasance </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-9</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/212-a6-2-9?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/212-a6-2-9/file" length="369107" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/212-a6-2-9/file"
                fileSize="369107"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-9</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Responding to context: Some lessons from experience in the water sector </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jeremyberkoff@mac.com"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Jeremy Berkoff </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Independent consultant, London, UK; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jeremyberkoff@mac.com">jeremyberkoff@mac.com</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: This paper focuses on an important lesson arising from long experience in Asia: the importance of adapting interventions in the water sector to their context. Water is pervasive and failure to appreciate how water programmes fit within a broader economic, environmental and social context can incur large costs. Too often we outsiders, not to mention local politicians and bureaucrats, have been driven by our own thinking and interests, imposing approaches and solutions that may be appropriate in wealthier and more manageable situations but which fail to take into account the complexities of the vast regions of Asia and their huge populations, widespread poverty and traditional practices.<br /> The argument is illustrated in two ways. First by a brief review of programmes in five widely differing river basins: the Aral Sea Basin in Central Asia; the Mahaweli Basin in Sri Lanka; the Ponniar Basin in South India; hydro-power development in Nepal and Bhutan; and the massive 3-H (Hai-Huang-Huai) basins of the North China Plain. This review illustrates how basin interventions can have profound implications for the development of whole regions, even countries, and that politicians and water professionals have too readily driven priorities that are insensitive to the real interests of the areas concerned, whether they involve action (as in the Aral Sea, Mahaweli and Ponniar cases) or inaction (as in Nepal). A measured approach (as in Bhutan and North China) within a broad understanding of the interests of the country or region concerned can have major benefits.<br /> Second, by an assessment of the irrigation sector. Irrigation is by far the largest water user and has played a central role in Asia's agricultural development, yet there has been surprisingly little progress in understanding how the prevailing context and associated incentives impact on farmer and official behaviour. This has, in my view, resulted in misjudgments concerning irrigation potential and returns. The issues are discussed under four headings: water use, crop output, institutional performance and irrigation modernisation. They may need modification in a warming world, but as they stand the paper's conclusions suggest that within its context Asian irrigation is more productive - and, dare I say it, efficient - than is commonly supposed. Failure to recognise this fact has led to unrealistic expectations from irrigation interventions and hence to wasted resources and effort. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Water, experience, context, river basins, irrigation </span></p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/212-a6-2-9?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Responding to context: Some lessons from experience in the water sector </strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jeremyberkoff@mac.com"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Jeremy Berkoff </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Independent consultant, London, UK; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:jeremyberkoff@mac.com">jeremyberkoff@mac.com</a> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: This paper focuses on an important lesson arising from long experience in Asia: the importance of adapting interventions in the water sector to their context. Water is pervasive and failure to appreciate how water programmes fit within a broader economic, environmental and social context can incur large costs. Too often we outsiders, not to mention local politicians and bureaucrats, have been driven by our own thinking and interests, imposing approaches and solutions that may be appropriate in wealthier and more manageable situations but which fail to take into account the complexities of the vast regions of Asia and their huge populations, widespread poverty and traditional practices.<br /> The argument is illustrated in two ways. First by a brief review of programmes in five widely differing river basins: the Aral Sea Basin in Central Asia; the Mahaweli Basin in Sri Lanka; the Ponniar Basin in South India; hydro-power development in Nepal and Bhutan; and the massive 3-H (Hai-Huang-Huai) basins of the North China Plain. This review illustrates how basin interventions can have profound implications for the development of whole regions, even countries, and that politicians and water professionals have too readily driven priorities that are insensitive to the real interests of the areas concerned, whether they involve action (as in the Aral Sea, Mahaweli and Ponniar cases) or inaction (as in Nepal). A measured approach (as in Bhutan and North China) within a broad understanding of the interests of the country or region concerned can have major benefits.<br /> Second, by an assessment of the irrigation sector. Irrigation is by far the largest water user and has played a central role in Asia's agricultural development, yet there has been surprisingly little progress in understanding how the prevailing context and associated incentives impact on farmer and official behaviour. This has, in my view, resulted in misjudgments concerning irrigation potential and returns. The issues are discussed under four headings: water use, crop output, institutional performance and irrigation modernisation. They may need modification in a warming world, but as they stand the paper's conclusions suggest that within its context Asian irrigation is more productive - and, dare I say it, efficient - than is commonly supposed. Failure to recognise this fact has led to unrealistic expectations from irrigation interventions and hence to wasted resources and effort. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Water, experience, context, river basins, irrigation </span></p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-8</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/211-a6-2-8?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/211-a6-2-8/file" length="322626" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/211-a6-2-8/file"
                fileSize="322626"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-8</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Why has the south African national water act been so difficult to implement? </strong></span>
</p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:barbara@pegasys.co.za"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Barbara Schreiner </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Consultant, Pegasys Strategy and Development, Pretoria, South Africa; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:barbara@pegasys.co.za">barbara@pegasys.co.za</a> </strong>
</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: The South African National Water Act (Act 36 of 1998) was hailed by the international water community as one of the most progressive pieces of water legislation in the world, and a major step forward in the translation of the concept of integrated water resources management (IWRM) into legislation. It has been widely quoted and referred to, and a number of countries ranging from China to Zambia have used it as an example in the revision of their own water legislation. And yet, 15 years down the line, implementation of the act has been only partially successful. In a number of critical aspects, implementation has, in fact, been weak. This paper sets out some personal reflections on the challenges facing the implementation of this remarkable piece of legislation and on the failure to achieve the initial high ambitions within the South African water sector. Through this process, it may be that there are lessons for other countries and for South Africa itself as it continues to face the challenge of implementation of the National Water Act (NWA). </span>
</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Integrated Water Resources Management, institutional capacity, implementation challenges, accountability, water law, South Africa </span>
</p>]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/211-a6-2-8?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><em>Viewpoint</em> - Why has the south African national water act been so difficult to implement? </strong></span>
</p>
<p><strong><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:barbara@pegasys.co.za"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt;">Barbara Schreiner </span></a><br /> <span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt;">Consultant, Pegasys Strategy and Development, Pretoria, South Africa; </span><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="mailto:barbara@pegasys.co.za">barbara@pegasys.co.za</a> </strong>
</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">ABSTRACT: The South African National Water Act (Act 36 of 1998) was hailed by the international water community as one of the most progressive pieces of water legislation in the world, and a major step forward in the translation of the concept of integrated water resources management (IWRM) into legislation. It has been widely quoted and referred to, and a number of countries ranging from China to Zambia have used it as an example in the revision of their own water legislation. And yet, 15 years down the line, implementation of the act has been only partially successful. In a number of critical aspects, implementation has, in fact, been weak. This paper sets out some personal reflections on the challenges facing the implementation of this remarkable piece of legislation and on the failure to achieve the initial high ambitions within the South African water sector. Through this process, it may be that there are lessons for other countries and for South Africa itself as it continues to face the challenge of implementation of the National Water Act (NWA). </span>
</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt;">KEYWORDS: Integrated Water Resources Management, institutional capacity, implementation challenges, accountability, water law, South Africa </span>
</p>]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
              <item>
           <title>A6-2-7</title>
           <link>https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/210-a6-2-7?format=html</link>
           <enclosure url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/210-a6-2-7/file" length="685089" type="application/pdf" />
           <media:content
                url="https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/210-a6-2-7/file"
                fileSize="685089"
                type="application/pdf"
                medium="document"
           />
           <media:title type="plain">A6-2-7</media:title>
           <media:description type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt"><b><em>Viewpoint</em> - Happy like a clam in French water </b></span></p>
<p>
<b><a href="mailto:pftb@free.fr" style="text-decoration: none"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt">Pierre-Frédéric Ténière-Buchot </span></a><br />
<span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt">Former CEO, Agence de l'Eau Seine-Normandie (Paris, France), Vice-President 'Programme Solidarité Eau', Member of the Académie de l'Eau and of the World Water Council; </span><a href="mailto:pftb@free.fr" style="text-decoration: none">pftb@free.fr</a> </b>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">ABSTRACT: After a few lines about his personal history, the author presents the legal context for water in France in the last century, and describes the hesitant first steps of the French Agences de l'Eau during the 1970s. While the financial system of French water policy is presented in detail, the role of economic transfers between various categories of water users is underlined. Then, the general socio-political aspects of French water governance are explained. A diagram illustrating the financial decision-making procedure for water (the 'water wheel') is given. Simple advice is drawn from the experience of a CEO of a water agency: the most useful skill for a water professional is to know how to swim.</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">KEYWORDS: Agences de l'eau, river basin management, river basin organisation, water management </span>
</p>
]]></media:description>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue2/210-a6-2-7?format=html</guid>
           <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; line-height: 120%; font-size: 12pt"><b><em>Viewpoint</em> - Happy like a clam in French water </b></span></p>
<p>
<b><a href="mailto:pftb@free.fr" style="text-decoration: none"><span style="color: blue; font-size: 11pt">Pierre-Frédéric Ténière-Buchot </span></a><br />
<span style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt">Former CEO, Agence de l'Eau Seine-Normandie (Paris, France), Vice-President 'Programme Solidarité Eau', Member of the Académie de l'Eau and of the World Water Council; </span><a href="mailto:pftb@free.fr" style="text-decoration: none">pftb@free.fr</a> </b>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">ABSTRACT: After a few lines about his personal history, the author presents the legal context for water in France in the last century, and describes the hesitant first steps of the French Agences de l'Eau during the 1970s. While the financial system of French water policy is presented in detail, the role of economic transfers between various categories of water users is underlined. Then, the general socio-political aspects of French water governance are explained. A diagram illustrating the financial decision-making procedure for water (the 'water wheel') is given. Simple advice is drawn from the experience of a CEO of a water agency: the most useful skill for a water professional is to know how to swim.</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt">KEYWORDS: Agences de l'eau, river basin management, river basin organisation, water management </span>
</p>
]]></description>
           <author>info@water-alternatives.org (The Editors)</author>
           <category>Issue2</category>
           <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
       </item>
          </channel>
</rss>